The post-American world has been announced many times. The announcement keeps being premature.
The Persistent Announcement
The post-American world — the international order in which the United States no longer exercises the dominant structural position it has held since 1945 — has been announced at regular intervals since at least the 1970s. Each announcement has been motivated by genuine evidence of relative American decline: the end of the gold standard, the oil shocks, the rise of Japan, the Soviet military buildup, the Asian financial crisis, the Iraq war, the financial crisis, the rise of China. Each announcement has been premature, because the structural conditions that underpin American dominance have proved more durable than the specific weaknesses that motivated the announcement.
The reasons for the announcement's persistence are instructive. American structural dominance rests on several foundations that are difficult to replicate simultaneously: the world's primary reserve currency, the dominant military with global force projection, the most productive innovation ecosystem, the deepest and most liquid capital markets, and the network of alliances that gives American preferences influence in most of the world's important decision-making forums. Each of these foundations can be eroded individually. Eroding all of them simultaneously — which is what a genuine transition to a post-American world requires — has not yet occurred.
What Is Actually Changing
What is changing is not American dominance so much as the conditions required to maintain it. American dominance in the postwar period was partly a function of the structural advantages enumerated above and partly a function of the absence of credible alternatives — the absence of other states with the combination of scale, capability, and institutional investment required to provide the public goods that American leadership provided. The rise of China as a genuine alternative provider of development finance, infrastructure investment, and institutional architecture has reduced the uniqueness of American provision without eliminating it, which represents a genuine change in the structure of the international order even if the post-American announcement remains premature.
The post-American world is not approaching — it has already partially arrived. The question is not whether American dominance is declining but what kind of order is being built as the relative weight of American structural power decreases. That question is more interesting and more consequential than the announcement that premature declinist analysis keeps making.
Discussion