Institutional variation creates opportunities that sophisticated operators exploit and structural inequalities that governance must address.
Institutional Variation as Opportunity
Institutional variation — the differences between regulatory frameworks, legal systems, administrative capacities, and governance standards across jurisdictions — creates arbitrage opportunities for organisations that can identify and exploit the gaps, inconsistencies, and asymmetries that variation produces. The regulatory arbitrage that locates corporate functions in the most favourable regulatory environment for those functions. The judicial arbitrage that selects the legal forum most favourable to the organisation's interests for the resolution of disputes. The labour arbitrage that sources labour from the jurisdictions with the most favourable labour cost and regulatory environments. Each of these is a form of institutional arbitrage — the exploitation of institutional variation to reduce the organisation's costs or increase its options.
Institutional arbitrage is rational from the individual organisation's perspective. It is collectively costly when it is widespread: the regulatory competition that institutional arbitrage induces — the pressure on jurisdictions to lower their standards to avoid losing the economic activity that arbitrage-seeking organisations are willing to relocate — reduces the standards that the competing jurisdictions provide to their populations. The race to the bottom in corporate tax rates, environmental standards, and labour regulation that international institutional arbitrage has produced is the collective cost of the individually rational arbitrage strategies of organisations with the capacity to exploit jurisdictional variation.
Institutional arbitrage is the rational exploitation of governance failure at the global level — the absence of the international coordination that would prevent the race to the bottom that individual arbitrage strategies collectively induce. The organisation that exploits it is acting rationally within the rules that exist. The rules that exist produce outcomes that no jurisdiction would choose if it could prevent them unilaterally. That is a governance problem, not a market problem.
Discussion