Gabriel Mahia Systems · Power · Strategy

What COVID Exposed About Governance

COVID-19 did not create the governance failures it revealed. It made visible the failures that had been accumulating in institutional systems that appeared functional until the stress test exposed them.

The Exposure Function

The COVID-19 pandemic's primary governance contribution was not the novel governance challenges it created — though it created some — but the exposure function it performed: the revealing of governance failures that pre-existed the pandemic but were obscured by the absence of a sufficient stress test. The health system whose surge capacity was inadequate had been inadequate before COVID — the pandemic exposed it. The social safety net that failed to reach the most vulnerable when the economic shock of lockdowns hit had structural inadequacies before COVID — the pandemic exposed them. The intergovernmental coordination architecture that produced the fragmented response to a national public health emergency had coordination failures before COVID — the pandemic exposed them.

The exposure function is governance analysis's most valuable input and its most politically uncomfortable one. To acknowledge what COVID exposed is to acknowledge that the institutions that failed during the pandemic were already failing before it — that the failure was not an exceptional response to an exceptional event but an exceptional event revealing ordinary institutional performance. The governance implication is that the reforms required are not emergency measures for exceptional conditions but structural reforms for ordinary institutional failures that the emergency made unavoidable to ignore.

The Window That Closes

The post-pandemic governance reform window — the period of political urgency and public attention in which the reforms that COVID exposed as necessary can be enacted — closes as the acute phase of the pandemic passes and the political attention that exceptional circumstances generated returns to normal levels. The reforms enacted in the window are more ambitious than the reforms that the normal political environment enables; the reforms not enacted in the window are deferred to a future political environment that is less favourable to addressing the conditions the pandemic revealed. Understanding when the window closes is understanding when the governance system reverts to the equilibrium that produced the failures the pandemic exposed.

COVID exposed what was already there. The governance response that treats COVID as an exceptional event requiring exceptional measures has learned the wrong lesson. The governance response that treats COVID as a revealing stress test on ordinary institutional systems — and uses the exposure to address the ordinary failures it made extraordinary — has learned the right one.

Discussion